The concept is expanded on in the Judaic-Christian tradition of loving God: The best characters, it follows, may produce the best kind of friendship and hence love: Nonetheless, there is a kernel of truth in the bestowal view: The intuitive answer is that I love you but not him.
To love another, Helm claims, is to care about him as the particular person he is and so, other things being equal, to value the things he values.
The metaphor of a mirror also suggests that our beloveds will be in the relevant respects similar to us, so that merely by observing them, we can come to know ourselves better in a way that is, if not free from bias, at least more objective than otherwise. This invokes a hierarchical epistemology, that only the initiated, the experienced, the philosophical, or the poetical or musical, may gain insights into its nature.
Given this, Velleman claims that love is similarly a response to the dignity of persons, and as such it is the dignity of the object of our love that justifies that love. What, then, explains the selectivity of love—why I love some people and not others.
Awareness, that is the secret to love. All of these foster the sort of emotional interdependence Baier is after—a kind of intimacy you have with your beloved. Not the words, but how they feel. With one person of different ones.
And Delaney, responding to an apparent tension between our desire to be loved unselfishly for fear of otherwise being exploited and our desire to be loved for reasons which presumably are attractive to our lover and hence have a kind of selfish basissaysp. Instead, the focus here will be on these contemporary understandings of love, including romantic love, understood as an attitude we take towards other persons.
Nonetheless, one might wonder about whether that perspective of love itself can be distorted and what the norms are in terms of which such distortions are intelligible. I love my dog or cat.
The strange think is, that almost nobody knows what love is. The second criticism involves a substantive view concerning love. Nonetheless, the command also entails an egalitarian love-hence the Christian code to "love thy enemies" Matthew 5: This implies that love has a "nature," a proposition that some may oppose arguing that love is conceptually irrational, in the sense that it cannot be described in rational or meaningful propositions.
Saying and thinking I want to find the love of my life and not I want a relationship is fundamental.
Love may therefore become an epiphenomenal entity, generated by human action in loving, but never grasped by the mind or language. Each of these answers to the question of why we love understands it to be asking about love quite generally, abstracted away from details of particular relationships.
The problem with the behaviorist vision of love is that it is susceptible to the poignant criticism that a person's actions need not express their inner state or emotionsA may be a very good actor.
It also, we might add, tends to lower stress and blood pressure and to increase health and longevity.
Those who consider love to be an aesthetic response would hold that love is knowable through the emotional and conscious feeling it provokes yet which cannot perhaps be captured in rational or descriptive language: Thus, we might understand the sort of love at issue in 4 to be, roughly, a matter of caring about another person as the person she is, for her own sake.
Accordingly, the physical love of an object, an idea, or a person in itself is not a proper form of love, love being a reflection of that part of the object, idea, or person, that partakes in Ideal beauty.
Is love to oneself or to another a duty. Nozick seems to think of a loss of autonomy in love as a desirable feature of the sort of union lovers can achieve. Precisely what may be missed will be discussed below in Section 6. Debate thus begins on what elements of a neighbor's conduct should be included in agape, and which should be excluded.
As Uncle Toby was informed, over two millennia later, "of these loves, according to Ficinus 's comment on Valesiusthe one is rational - the other is natural - the first The Nature of Sympathy. Nonetheless, it should be clear that what makes an account be an appraisal view of love is not the mere fact that love is understood to involve appraisal; many other accounts do so, and it is typical of robust concern accounts, for example cf.
The author of the classic philosophical treatment of love reflects on the trajectory, over decades, of his thoughts on love and other topics. InIrving Singer published the first volume of what would become a classic and much acclaimed trilogy on love.
Philosophy of Love. This article examines the nature of love and some of the ethical and political ramifications.
Philosophy of Love. This article examines the nature of love and some of the ethical and political ramifications. For the philosopher, the question “what is love?” generates a host of issues: love is an abstract noun which means for some it is a word unattached to anything real or sensible, that is all; for others, it is a means by which our being—our self and its.
thank. you! and welcome to the family. let us give you the royal treatment faster checkout, create a wishlist, & access to our philosopher rewards loyalty program.
please check your email shortly for the offer. Dec 05, · The love you feel for your partner is not the same as the love you feel for your mother. Even the love for your partner changes in time. You feel different emotions for different situations and.
This essay focuses on personal love, or the love of particular persons as such. Part of the philosophical task in understanding personal love is.Philosophy of love